IEA Hydrogen Task 52

Private preview

This site is shared with Task 52 leadership ahead of public launch. Please enter the password to continue.

Skip to main content
Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA

Task structure

Subtasks

An integrated analytical framework linking technology readiness, supply-chain feasibility and global transformation pathways for hydrogen-based iron and steelmaking.

Task 52 is organised into three interlinked Subtasks, each led by coordinating institutions to ensure coherence and complementarity. Together, they provide an integrated analytical framework that links technology readiness, supply-chain feasibility, and global transformation pathways for hydrogen-based iron and steelmaking.

Subtask A

Technology Assessment and Readiness

Lead

  • Prof Aidong Yang University of Oxford (UK)

A comprehensive review and synthesis of current and emerging hydrogen-based iron and steelmaking technologies, benchmarking direct reduction, hybrid smelting and electrolytic concepts.

Focus

  • Catalogue hydrogen-based ironmaking technologies (H₂-DRI, hybrid smelting, electrolytic concepts)
  • Evaluate technology readiness using the IEA 11-point TRL framework
  • Review capital and operating costs, energy efficiency and emissions performance
  • Track demonstration and pilot projects through a consolidated database
  • Identify technical barriers, scale-up considerations and innovation priorities

Outputs from Subtask A feed directly into supply-chain assessments in Subtask B and scenario analysis in Subtask C.

Subtask B

Resources, Supply Chains and Infrastructure

Leads

  • Dr Changlong Wang Monash University (Australia)
  • A/Prof Stuart Walsh Monash University (Australia)

An examination of logistics, infrastructure and supply-chain requirements for large-scale deployment and international trade of hydrogen-derived DRI, HBI and steel.

Focus

  • Map renewable energy supply, hydrogen production, storage and transport networks
  • Assess port and industrial infrastructure for DRI/HBI shipment and onshore processing
  • Compare energy carriers (liquid hydrogen, ammonia, DRI and HBI) and supply-chain trade-offs
  • Conduct regional case studies of supply-chain feasibility and cost competitiveness
  • Identify bottlenecks, enabling conditions and infrastructure investment priorities
  • Examine vertically integrated hydrogen–DRI–steel hubs vs disaggregated configurations

Subtask B develops the spatial and logistical context required for global pathway analysis in Subtask C.

Subtask C

Global Transformation Pathways, Competitiveness and Power Systems

Leads

  • Prof Falko Ueckerdt IT:U Linz (Austria) and PIK Potsdam (Germany)
  • Dr Wolf-Peter Schill DIW Berlin (Germany)

An assessment of global and national transformation pathways for hydrogen-based steelmaking, including competitiveness considerations and interactions with power and hydrogen systems.

Focus

  • Review scenario modelling studies of future steel system transformation
  • Analyse competitiveness of alternative production routes under different policy and cost conditions
  • Evaluate evolving production and trade patterns for green steel, DRI and HBI
  • Assess system-integration impacts of large-scale hydrogen demand on electricity networks
  • Identify policy measures and cooperation mechanisms that support deployment

Subtask C integrates technology and supply-chain inputs into global pathway and power-system analysis.

Linkage & Exchange

Task Linkage and Exchange

Lead

  • Prof Max Åhman Lund University (Sweden)

A cross-cutting activity that supports coordination and exchange across Subtasks A, B and C, connecting technology assessment, supply-chain analysis and global pathway modelling through a coherent Task-level framework.

Focus

  • Facilitate exchange between Subtask teams
  • Support synthesis of findings across technology, supply chains and global pathways
  • Identify cross-cutting policy, market and cooperation issues
  • Support workshops, expert dialogues and stakeholder engagement

Strengthens the link between technical analysis, policy relevance and international collaboration.

Explore who delivers this work

Meet the coordinating institutions and partners behind each Subtask, and see how their analysis informs the Task 52 Outlook.